How Gender Role Socialization Effects Girls More...

Adolescents are faced with many difficult life decisions which, when coupled with their lack of self-knowledge, cause identity crises. Not secure in themselves, teenagers must make decisions concerning how they will act, with who they will associate with, and what life decisions they will choose. Ultimately, the progression by which they determine their identity must inevitability be one of trial and error. In the book Reviving Ophelia, clinical psychologist Dr. Mary Pipher discusses the social and cultural pressures faced by today s adolescent girls based on her individual clients’ stories. This paper will examine how gender role socialization effects girls more specifically, depending on the teenage girls’ developmental level. Another crucial theme to be analyzed is the idea coined as lookism and the American culture, which according to the book is a determination of a woman s value based solely on appearance. Another common factor in each of the case studies p resented by Pipher is the theme of resisting authority and shutting out parental guidance substituting help with media and peers. By analyzing these young girls’ stories, it is clear to understand why young girls find themselves going down the wrong path growing up. As girls enter adolescence they are forced to decide who they want to become and how they want to be seen. Young girls growing up are under extreme pressure to conform to the ideals that society has deemed appropriate. In Reviving Ophelia,Show MoreRelatedComputer and Internet in Education13526 Words   |  55 Pagesatrisk teens. Abstract The increasing amount of time children are spending on computers at home and school has raised questions about how the use of computer technology may make a difference in their lives—from helping with homework to causing depression to encouraging violent behavior. This article provides an overview of the limited research on the effects of home computer use on children’s physical, cognitive, and social development. Initial research suggests, for example, that access to computersRead MoreControl Theory15246 Words   |  61 Pagesframeworks are bold—critics would say pretentious (Geis, 2000)—because they claim to be â€Å"general theories† that explain crime across types of crime and types of people. Hirschi also has shown little interest in race,class,and gender inequalities that others—especially those from more critical perspectives—see as fundamental to any explanation of crime (see, e.g., Miller Burack, 1993). Regardless of their m erits, these critiques have done little to dim Hirschi’s influence; if anything, the controversyRead MoreHow Pastoral Care Policy Has Contributed to the Management of Junior Secondary Schools In Botswana23474 Words   |  94 Pages2.3.4 Conclusion 22 2.4 Botswana perspective about implementation of PCP 23 2.4.1 Divisions and demarcations of school into houses 23 2.4.2 School leadership training 23 2.4.3 School supervision 23 2.4.4 Stakeholder partnerships 23 2.4.5 Role ambiguity 24 2.4.6 Socio-Economic changes 24 2.4.7 Conclusion 25 CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY 26 3.1 Research design 27 3.2 Population of the study and Justification 28 3.3 Sampling Procedure 29 3.4 The sample 29 3.5 Data collection procedure 31 Read MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesComprehensive Cases Indexes Glindex 637 663 616 623 Contents Preface xxii 1 1 Introduction What Is Organizational Behavior? 3 The Importance of Interpersonal Skills 4 What Managers Do 5 Management Functions 6 †¢ Management Roles 6 †¢ Management Skills 8 †¢ Effective versus Successful Managerial Activities 8 †¢ A Review of the Manager’s Job 9 Enter Organizational Behavior 10 Complementing Intuition with Systematic Study 11 Disciplines That Contribute to the OB Field 13 PsychologyRead MoreFundamentals of Hrm263904 Words   |  1056 Pageswith the most effective instructor and student resources With WileyPLUS: Students achieve concept mastery in a rich, structured environment that’s available 24/7 Instructors personalize and manage their course more effectively with assessment, assignments, grade tracking, and more manage time better study smarter save money From multiple study paths, to self-assessment, to a wealth of interactive visual and audio resources, WileyPLUS gives you everything you need to personalize the teachingRead MoreOrganisational Theory230255 Words   |  922 Pageset al. provide a highly readable account of ideas, perspectives and practices of organization. By thoroughly explaining, analyzing and exploring organization theory the book increases the understanding of a field that in recent years has become ever more fragmented. Organization theory is central to managing, organizing and reflecting on both formal and informal structures, and in this respect you will find this book timely, interesting and valuable. Peter Holdt Christensen, Associate Professor, CopenhagenRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 PagesBehavior that helps you actively study and prepare material for class. Chapter-by-chapter activities, including built-in pretests and posttests, focus on what you need to learn and to revi ew in order to succeed. Visit www.mymanagementlab.com to learn more. DEVELOPING MANAGEMENT SKILLS EIGHTH EDITION David A. Whetten BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY Kim S. Cameron UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Prentice Hall Boston Columbus Indianapolis New York San Francisco Upper Saddle River Amsterdam Cape Town DubaiRead MoreStrategic Marketing Management337596 Words   |  1351 Pages81 86 88 89 101 102 104 107 109 Stage One: Where are we now? Strategic and marketing analysis 2 Marketing auditing and the analysis of capability 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 Learning objectives Introduction Reviewing marketing effectiveness The role of SWOT analysis Competitive advantage and the value chain Conducting effective audits Summary 3 Segmental, productivity and ratio analysis 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.11 3.12 Learning objectives Introduction The clarification of

Brief Literature Review on Online Advetising - 884 Words

Online advertising Peter J. Danaher and Guy W. Mullarkey have published their research article entitled â€Å"Factors Affecting Online Advertising Recall : A Study of Students†. In this research article we examine factors that might impact on web advertising recall and recognition. These factors include the viewing mode, duration of page viewing, and web page context factors, including text and page background complexity and the style of the banner advertisement. Via an experimental design Peter J. Danaher and Guy W. Mullarkey,†Factors Affecting Online Advertising Recall : A Study of Students†- Journal of Advertising Research 2003, conducted on a student sample, we manipulate these factors over several levels. The key finding is that the†¦show more content†¦Shelly Rodgers and Esther Thorson33 Have published research paper entitled â€Å"The Interactive Advertising Model: How Users Perceive and Process Online Ads†. The authors provide an integrativ e processing model of Internet Advertising, which incorporates the functional and structural schools of thought. The model begins with the functional prospective, which attempts to identify reasons for Internet use. Since most individuals enter cyberspace with some goal or agenda, in mind, the authors argue that a model of online processing should begin with consideration of Internet functions. These functions, according to the authors, operates conjointly with the user’s mode-ranging from high goal-directed to playful-to influence the types of ads web users will attend to and process. The authors offer a broad scheme in which to classify most Internet ads, as well as a number of common features unique to these ads. The authors conclude by offering a number of hypotheses suggested by the model. Although the internet provides an efficient medium for advertising (Hoffman amp; Novak, 1996) practitioners are trying to figure out how to maximize this new medium (Eighmey amp; McCord 1998). Scholars are attempting to do the same. Their approach, however, generally differs from practitioners in the way rigorous theories, methods and models are built, used, tested and re-tested. Our purpose here is to offer an Interactive

Business Law of Violet and Sonny Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Business Law of Violet and Sonny. Answer: After going through the facts that have been provided in this question, the issue arises in the present case if Violet and Sonny can be held liable to repay the loan owed were Busy Bee Florist Shop to Friendly Bank. This liability may arise if Violet and Sonny are treated as the partners in the business. A partnership can be described as a relationship that is present between the persons were getting on business in common was the purpose of making a profit. In this way, there is an agreement created between two or more persons to enter a legally binding relationship. Therefore this relationship is contractual in nature. In Green v Beesley (1835), Tindal J, has stated that the definition of partnership has always been understood as a medium participation, yet a legal entity is not created when the participants create a partnership. Similarly in Smith v Anderson (1880), James LJ had described the concept of partnership in the following words. A general partnership comprises of definite individuals who are bound together by contract created between themselves to continue jointly to achieve a joint object, either during their pleasure or for a limited period. It is essentially composed of the persons who have originally intending to the contract with each other. However, despite the pres ence of these definitions, limitations have been placed on the number of persons that can become partners. The relevant provision in this regard is present in the Corporations Act, 2001. Similarly, the law provides that the partnership will have a name, which will be known as the name of the firm. The law of partnership has been derived from case law as well as statute law. The relevant provisions are present in the Partnership Act, 1892. Partnership law has been described as a special type of agency. The reason is that when the partners are acting in course of partnership business, they are considered to be acting as agents of each other (Lang v James Morrison Co Ltd., 1911). The law provides that three elements should be present so that it can be said that a particular relationship is a partnership. Therefore, the parties should be carrying on business; in common; and for the purpose of making profit. All these elements need to be satisfied for the purpose of the creation of a partnership. On the other hand, even if a single element is not present, the religion cannot be described as a partnership. In order to decide the meaning of the term 'carrying on business', the issue arises if there is a need of establishing repetitiveness of action as compared to an isolated action by the parties. In a number of earlier decisions, the courts have said about the need for having a continuity or repetition of action. For example, in Smith v Anderson (1880), there was a group of investors. These investors have subscribed to purchase the shares by forming a trust in different submarine cable companies. The trustees, sold his shares to the investors. Along with the other investors, Smith had also received a certificate. However, later on, and application was made by Smith wind up the trust. The reason given in this regard was that the trust was an illegal association, keeping in view section 4 of the English Companies Act, 1862. This section, provided that no company, association or partnership comprising more than 20 persons can be formed to carry on a business, unless it is register. Under these circumstances, the issue arose if the trust in the present case can be described as a partnership. For this purpose, the court considered the nature of the press as well as the relationship of the parties involved. Although, every person holding a certificate could elect trustees, received a trust report and the trustees had certain powers related with management by the court noted the fact that the trustees did not have the power to speculate. Similarly, there were no mutual rights and obligations present among the persons involved in it. As a result, our conclusion was made by the court that they just cannot be described as a partnership because there was a lack of association for 'carrying on business'. There are certain rules present in the Partnership Act which can be used to decide if the relationship between the parties can be described as partnership or not. For example, section 2(2) object provides that merely the fact of sharing the gross returns of the business does not in itself result in a partnership, whether the persons who are sharing the returns have got this not have a joint or common right in any property from which the returns are derived. Hence, only the fact of sharing the gross profit made by the business is not sufficient for the purpose of the creation of a partnership. An example in this regard can be given of Cribb v Korn (1911). In this case, a landowner has employed Korn as a rural worker. There was an agreement concluded between the landowner and Cribb. This agreement provided that the landowner will have sloughs reviews and observation over the particular area of Cribb's land. The agreement also provided that machinery and stock would be provided by Cribb , while the landowner was going to be half of the proceeds of the sale of produce to Cribb. Under these circumstances Korn suffered injuries when he was working on the land. He claimed compensation from Cribb. It was submitted by Korn, that in the present case, the landowner and Cribb were in fact, partners. However, the high court arrived at the conclusion that the partnership was not present between the parties, and it was only a tenancy. Due to the reason that the landowner enjoyed exclusive right to provide the land and no right was given to Cribb to direct or control the working over the land by the landowner, the relationship cannot be described as a partnership, but it was only a tenancy. Moreover, the fact of sharing the gross returns was not considered as sufficient for the purpose of establishing a partnership, but it only amounted to rent. Therefore in order to be partners, the parties are required to establish that they have agreed to carry on some business, for example in the present case, farming, in common and for the purpose of making a profit and later on to divide or to apply the profit to some agreed object. For example, in the above-mentioned case, there was nothing to show that it was the intention of the appellant to involve in farming or to be concerned in the transaction beyond the right to receive compensation. Another relevant rule in this regard is related with the sharing of profit and loss. In this regard, the partnership law provides that when a person receives a share, out of the profit made by the business, it is considered as a prima facie evidence that such person is a partner. However, the receipt of share in the profit or receiving a payment that is contingent on the profit made by the business, does not in itself establishes that such person can be described as a partner. The term profit has not been described in the Act. In Re Spanish Prospecting Co Ltd [1908-10], the court stated that the term profit implies a comparison between the state of the business on two particular dates that are generally separated by the year. The basic meaning of profit is the amount gained by the business in a year. Therefore, the profit can be ascertained by comparing the assets of the business on these two dates. However the difficulty that is present in interpreting the above-mentioned provision is due to the use of the term 'prima facie' that qualifies evidence. It appears that the fact related with the presence of profit sharing scheme can be admitted in evidence in support of the presence of a partnership, but it cannot be claimed only on the basis of this fact that the parties have entered into a partnership (Television Broadcasters Ltd v Ashtons Nominees Pty Ltd (No 1), 1979). Another relevant case is that of Cox v Hickman (1880). B. and J. Smith were partners and they were involved in business of iron masters and corn merchants. As they could not meet the outstanding obligations, they made an assignment of their property to their creditors, as trustees, who were going to carry on the business. After the current expenses were paid, the debt income was going to be divided among the creditors. After the creditors were paid in full, the property was going to be reconveyed to Smiths. Among others, Cox and Wheatcroft were also named as trustees. However, while Cox never accepted the trusteeship, Wheatcroft also resigned after six months. However after a designation, the other trustees incurred certain debts to Hickman. He initiated the present action against Cox and Wheatcroft claiming them to be partners in the business and as a result liable for the debts. The court stated that it had been argued that the creditors including Wheatcroft and Cox are interested in the profits. And as a result, they should be considered as partners. It is generally stated that the test regarding the presence of a partnership is to see if such person is entitled to receive out of the profit made by the business. The court stated that generally this test is sufficiently accurate, and the right to take part in the profits provides cogent evidence regarding the fact that such business was carried on, in part for or on behalf of the person. However, the real basis for the liability is if the trade has been carried on by the person acting on his behalf. Therefore, only in such a case the person can be held liable for the obligations of the business and entitled to the profit made by the business or to share it. Under these circumstances, the court arrived at the conclusion that in the present case, Wheatcroft and Cox cannot be considered as the partners in business and as a result, they cannot be held liable for the debts of the business. In the present case, the agreement created between Rose and Violet provides that Violet will lend $20,000 to the partnership and in return, a loan agreement will be drawn between the parties which provide that the lender (Violet) is going to receive a share of 20%, out of the profit or the loss made by the business. The agreement also provided that the lender was going to receive quarterly business statement as well as the right to examine the partnership books. However, it was also mentioned in the agreement that the lender should not be considered as a partner in the business. But by applying the test of partnership mentioned above, it can be concluded in the present case that Violet is a partner in Busy Bee Florist Shop even if the agreement concluded between the parties provides that Violet should not be treated as a partner. On the other hand, Sonny had also agreed to lend $10,000 to Mary, but the ones interest on the loan. Therefore, according to the agreement between the parties, Sonny was going to receive a salary along with one eighth share out of the profit made by the business. However, as mentioned above, only the fact of receiving a share of the profits of the business is not conclusive proof that the person is a partner in the business and therefore liable for the debts of the business. On these grounds, in the present case, the elements necessary for the creation of a partnership are not present in this case. As a result, Sonny cannot be held as a partner in Busy Bee Florist Shop. Hence, Sonny is not liable to Friendly Bank regarding the debts owed by Busy Bee Florist Shop. It can be concluded that while it can be treated as a partner in the business and therefore liable to Friendly Bank regarding the debt owed by the business, but Sonny is not a partner and therefore is not liable to the bank for the debts. References Cox v Hickman (1880) 8 HL Cas 268 Cribb v Korn (1911) 12 CLR 205 Green v Beesley (1835) 2 Bing N C 108 Lang v James Morrison Co Ltd (1911) 13 CLR 1 Re Spanish Prospecting Co Ltd [1908-10] All ER Rep 573 Smith v Anderson (1880) 15 Ch D 247 Television Broadcasters Ltd v Ashtons Nominees Pty Ltd (No 1) (1979) 22 SASR 552

Six Sigma Class Intro and Ppt free essay sample

Understanding Six Sigma ? Definition ? World at Six Sigma examples ? Six Sigma Scale ? Why Six Sigma ? Six Sigma Methodologies Tools ? Define ? Measure ? Analyze ? Improve ? Control WHAT’S IN A NAME? Sigma is the Greek letter representing the standard deviation of a population of data. ? Sigma is a measure of standard deviation (the data spread) ? ? ? SIX SIGMA IS †¦ ? A statistical concept that measures a process in terms of defects – at the six sigma level, there 3. 4 defects per million opportunities ? A defect is anything that results in customer dissatisfaction Six Sigma is a methodology and a symbol of quality ? HOW OFTEN ARE WE DELIVERING ON TIME? ? If the target time is 30 Mins, the graphs below show two curves with average at 25 Mins 30 mins 30 mins s s 0 10 x 30 2 sigma 20 40 50 0 10 20 x 30 4 sigma 40 50 ? ? How many standard deviations can you â€Å"fit† within customer expectations? Managing by the average doesn’t tell the whole story. The average and the variation together show what’s happening. We will write a custom essay sample on Six Sigma Class Intro and Ppt or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page MANAGING UP THE SIGMA SCALE Sigma 1 2 3 4 5 6 % Good % Bad 30. 9% 69. % 93. 3% DPMO 691,462 308,538 66,807 69. 1% 30. 9% 6. 7% 99. 38% 99. 977% 0. 62% 0. 023% 6,210 233 3. 4 99. 9997% 0. 00034% EXAMPLES OF THE SIGMA SCALE In a world at 3 sigma. . . ? In a world at 6 sigma. . . ? There are 964 U. S. flight cancellations per day. The police make 7 false arrests every 4 minutes. 1 U. S. flight is cancelled every 3 weeks. There are fewer than 4 false arrests per month. ? ? ? In one hour, 47,283 international long distance calls are accidentally disconnected. ? It would take more than 2 years to see the same number of dropped international calls. WHY SIX SIGMA? †¢ At GE, Six Sigma added more than $ 2 billion to the bottom line in 1999 alone †¢ Motorola saved more than $ 15 billion in the first 10 years of its Six Sigma effort AlliedSignal reports saving $ 1,5 billion through Six Sigma. †¢ †¢ Six Sigma is about practices that help you eliminate defects and always deliver products and services that meet customer specifications How are these savings realized? cost of scrap? cost of rework? cost of excessive cycle times and delays? Benefits of added capacity and man-hours DMAIC – THE IMPROVEMENT METHODOLOGY Define Objective: DEFINE the opportunity Measure Analyze Improve Control Objective: Objective: Objective: MEASURE current ANALYZE the root IMPROVE the performance causes of problems process to eliminate root causes Key Measure Tools: †¢ Critical to Quality Requirements (CTQs) †¢ Sample Plan †¢ Capability Analysis †¢ Failure Modes and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Key Analyze Tools: †¢ Histograms, Boxplots, MultiVari Charts, etc. †¢ Hypothesis Tests †¢ Regression Analysis Objective: CONTROL the process to sustain the gains. Key Define Tools: †¢ Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) †¢ Voice of the Stakeholder (VOS) †¢ Project Charter †¢ As-Is Process Map(s) †¢ Primary Metric (Y) Key Improve Key Control Tools: Tools: †¢ Solution Selection †¢ Control Charts Matrix †¢ Contingency †¢ To-Be Process and/or Action Map(s) Plan(s) DEFINE – DMAIC PROJECT WHAT IS THE PROJECT? $ Project Charter Cost of Poor Quality Stakeholders Voice of the Stakeholde r Six Sigma What is the problem? The â€Å"problem† is the Output ? What is the cost of this problem ? Who are the stake holders / decision makers ? Align resources and expectations ? DEFINE – CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS WHAT ARE THE CTQS? WHAT MOTIVATES CUSTOMER? SECONDARY RESEARCH Market Data THE Voice of the Customer Key Customer Issue Critical to Quality Listening Posts Industry Intel Industry Benchmarking Customer Service Customer Correspondence PRIMARY RESEARCH Survey s OTM Observations Focus Groups MEASURE – BASELINES AND CAPABILITY WHAT IS OUR CURRENT LEVEL Sample some data / not all data Current Process actuals measured against the Customer expectation OF PERFORMANCE?